XpertCoding for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

FQHC coding is different.
Your AI should know why.

Your team understands the complexity of community healthcare. Your coding platform should, too. Meet autonomous AI built around the clinical, quality, and payer decisions between the note and the claim.

Built around FQHC encounter, payer, and quality workflows.

Medicare PPSFQHC payment codesUDS Reporting context

For your health center's leadership

Keep coding moving.
Keep your team focused on care.

Your health center needs timely coding, accurate claims, and less administrative work. XpertCoding uses autonomous AI to code documented care within your existing EHR workflow, with expert review for cases that need attention.

01

Protect your revenue cycle

Reduce coding backlogs, capture supported services, and address coding issues before claims move forward.

02

Support your clinicians and quality team

Reduce manual coding work, identify documentation gaps, and capture supported diagnoses and quality codes.

03

Maintain visibility and control

Monitor turnaround, review exceptions, and follow the evidence behind coding decisions.

Federally Qualified Community Health Centers already working with XpertDox
Lone Star Circle of Care logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in Texas
Lone Star Circle of Care

Texas · FQHC

Read the press release
CHP Berkshires logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in Massachusetts
CHP Berkshires

Massachusetts · FQHC

Read the press release
Mountain Park Health Center logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in Arizona
Mountain Park Health Center

Arizona · FQHC

Presbyterian Medical Services logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in New Mexico
Presbyterian Medical Services

New Mexico · FQHC

Camarena Health logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in California
Camarena Health

California · FQHC

Mariposa Community Health Center logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in Arizona
Mariposa Community Health Center

Arizona · FQHC

Community Health Centers, Inc. logo, an FQHC client working with XpertDox in Florida
Community Health Centers, Inc.

Florida · FQHC

The details are the difference

Built around the way
community health centers get paid.

FQHC billing has its own rules. XpertCoding connects the care documented by your team to supported codes, payer requirements, and reviewable decisions.

01 / CPT & HCPCS

Code the care delivered

Same-day medical and mental health care; AWVs; qualifying visits and bundled services.

02 / The diagnosis

Supported, not assumed

Secondary diagnosis reporting requirements, accurate acuity, SDOH, and linkage to the service performed.

03 / The quality

Capture the care delivered

Blood pressure and A1c results mapped to quality codes, with program eligibility checks.

04 / The claim

The payer matters

77x claim types, qualifying services, revenue codes, and FQHC specific HCPCS codes

01

CPT & HCPCS coding

CPT coding.
Built for FQHC encounters.

Capture the care delivered and apply the appropriate FQHC payment rules.

Start with the CPT code: the E&M level, procedure or therapy supported by the note. Then connect it to the HCPCS payment codes and payer rules that shape an FQHC claim.

levelsProcedures & servicesModifiersHCPCS relationships

Select the supported CPT codes

Evaluate the documented E&M service and procedures. In this example, 99213 and 90832 represent the separately documented medical and psychotherapy services.

Payer Rules

Capture supported services, correct unsupported codes, and retain service detail even when payment is bundled into the encounter rate.

Connect CPT to HCPCS and payer requirements

Pair the qualifying CPT services with G0467 and G0470 in the Medicare FQHC example.

02

ICD-10-CM coding

The whole patient.
The supported diagnosis.

Represent the complexity of your patients with diagnoses supported by the record.

Community health documentation often spans chronic disease, behavioral health, and barriers to care. Capture that complexity without inventing a diagnosis.

Diabetes with documented hyperglycemia

Use the clinician's assessment to select the supported diabetes code. A high lab value alone does not substitute for the diagnosis.

Housing instability with a documented risk

A signed care-team note documents that the patient is housed and at risk of homelessness. The social need is relevant to the current care plan.

Correct the imported complication

The clinician explicitly identifies the old neuropathy entry as an error. Remove that unsupported claim diagnosis and retain the supported findings.

The standard ICD-10-CM code set applies. This example uses the FY 2027 rules for an October 2026 encounter. Read the coding guidelines

03

Quality-metric coding

Claim-level quality.
Health-center reporting context.

Support quality workflows with documented information, and appropriate code capture.

Connect supported quality-code opportunities to payer programs and the health center's reporting team. UDS requirements remain a separately defined reporting workflow.

Eligibility before assignment

Check the applicable patient, visit, timing, and exclusion criteria. Finding a value in the note is the beginning of the review, not the whole decision.

Payer and program context

Keep claim-level quality coding, payer incentives, and reporting programs distinct. Apply the relevant program version and contract context to the opportunity under review.

Connect to the health-center reporting team

HRSA Health Center Program awardees and look-alikes submit UDS data. Preserve the source values and dates that the separately scoped reporting workflow needs.

Claim-level quality coding

128/76 becomes two supported code actions.

In this hypertension encounter, the documented reading supports 3074F and 3078F under the illustrated payer reporting workflow. Check both values and prevent duplicate reporting.

BP: 128/76Current encounterPayer accepts3074F + 3078FSource retained

A blood-pressure result with a clear code trail

Record: a 58-year-old patient with hypertension; blood pressure 128/76 mmHg. The configured payer accepts Category II reporting.

3074F + 3078F reflect the documented systolic and diastolic ranges. The demo checks the current encounter, source reading, and duplication before preparing both codes.

Claim-level reporting supports the quality workflow; measure eligibility, exclusions and annual reporting remain separate checks. 2026 payer coding reference

Explore the coding and quality workflows that matter to your FQHC.

04

Billing & payer requirements

FQHC claim lines.
The right payer context.

Prepare claim details around the FQHC rules and payer requirements that apply.

For Medicare, inspect a 77X claim with each FQHC payment code and its qualifying service. For Medicaid, follow the separately labeled Arizona encounter example.

Review the FQHC 77X claim, PPS payment code, qualifying service, and revenue-code relationships in the Medicare example.

Autonomy you can understand

Sophisticated technology.
Practical, reviewable work.

XpertCoding brings autonomous coding together with payer context and reviewable decisions. Your team needs to see the work completed, the cases that need attention and the evidence behind each action.

From clinical documentation

Understand the encounter and the information available.

Through coding and payer context

Bring the applicable requirements into the decision process.

To action, exception, and explanation

Make the result understandable to the team responsible for it.

Business intelligence & documentation improvement

Start with your question.
See where to focus.

See which claims need attention and where documentation can improve.

Connect the coding work to the decisions your revenue-cycle, quality and clinical teams make next.

Results

Faster coding.
Focused human review.

See how quickly coding moves, how much needs expert review and where your team should focus.

Processing time

23hours

From documentation to coding

Time from documentation to coding output.

Manual review

8%

Expert attention where it is needed

Share of encounters routed for expert review.

What would this change for your health center?

In your demo, review your current coding backlog, turnaround and review workload. Use those measures to define the operating goals for your FQHC.

Coding backlog

Which encounters are waiting, and why?

Team workload

Which cases need people, and which can move automatically?

Clinical follow-up

Which documentation gaps need a targeted response?

Review your backlog, turnaround and team workload with XpertDox.

Coding compliance

Expert leadership.
Traceable coding decisions.

Know how coding decisions are checked and who oversees the work.

Documentation support, validation, expert oversight and traceability belong in the same conversation. Follow the documentation, validation and review steps below.

Start with the documentation that supports the action. Review supported additions alongside corrections, removals and unresolved conflicts.

Kelly Canter

Coding & compliance leadership

Kelly Canter

MHA, RHIT, CCS, CRCR, CPM, FAHIMA

Chief Medical Coding and Compliance Officer

Member, AHIMA Board of Directors

More than 20 years in health information, revenue cycle and technology.

LinkedIn · AHIMA profile & photo

Cybersecurity & continuity

Community healthcare is built on trust.

Review the safeguards that protect patient information and keep coding operations available.

SOC 2 Type 2

Controls and independent examination

ISO/IEC 27001

Information security management

ISO/IEC 22301

Business continuity management

HIPAA safeguards

Patient-information protection

Walk through coding oversight, validation and the decision record.

Implementation

Your EHR. Your workflow.
A connected coding team.

Know what changes for your team, who owns each step and how you approve go-live.

Connect your EHR, validate the FQHC coding decisions and launch with clear ownership. Your team keeps its documentation workflow while XpertDox manages the coding connection, configuration and ongoing review.

Connect with the systems your team already uses.

EHR and practice-management connections include

  • Epic
  • athenahealth
  • eClinicalWorks (eCW)
  • NextGen
  • Experity
  • ModMed
  • Centricity / AthenaPM
  • Practice Fusion

Using another EHR or PM system? We can scope a custom connection with your team.

See how the data moves.

Choose a connection method, then follow a completed encounter into XpertCoding and back to the working system.

HL7 v2 and ADT messaging

Use ADT messages for patient and encounter context. Configure the accompanying documentation and charge interfaces for the full exchange, including return of coding output to the EHR or PM system.

↩ Back into your workflowReturn coding output through the configured interface
1 / 4

Receive completed documentation

The source encounter brings the signed note, patient and encounter identifiers, documented services and existing coding into the agreed workflow.

  • Completed clinical note
  • Patient and encounter match
  • Existing diagnoses and services

Receive completed documentation…

A clear path from kickoff to ongoing operations.

Select a phase to see the work, the owners and the decision that moves the project forward.

FQHC · 01 · Connect & configure

Build the connection around your workflow.

Map FQHC sites, EHR access, payer enrollment and the relationship between encounter-payment and service lines.

XpertDox

  • Map source documentation and the coding return destination.
  • Configure the EHR connection, sites, practitioners and payer rules.
  • Test field mapping, record matching and exception handling.

Your team

  • Name the technical lead and implementation owner.
  • Provide approved access, coding guidelines and payer preferences.
  • Confirm which EHR or PM fields and work queues will receive output.
A named implementation lead

A shared plan, regular status reviews and clear escalation contacts keep technical and coding work moving together.

Clinical and coding participation

Your designated reviewer and clinical decision-maker resolve questions, approve preferences and provide feedback during validation.

A plan built at kickoff

Confirm milestones after access, interface requirements, documentation and reviewer availability are understood. Connection setup is one part of the full rollout.

Discuss your EHR, service lines and rollout plan.

Hear from FQHC peers

The strongest proof comes from the people doing the work.

Hear how Federally Qualified Community Health Centers describe their experience with XpertCoding.

Lone Star Circle of Care

FQHC partnership

We've cleared our claims backlog, improved our collections, and made our coding much more efficient.

Lone Star Circle of Care

Dr. Tracy Angelocci , Senior Strategic Advisor for Clinical Innovation & Integration, as quoted November 6, 2024.

Read the press release
CHP Berkshires

FQHC partnership

Our coding team is now able to focus on value-based care initiatives and auditing.

CHP Berkshires

Jesse Suphan , Senior Director of Revenue Cycle & Quality, as quoted November 18, 2025.

Read the press release

For the detailed evaluator

The questions behind the decision.

XpertCoding is designed to automate coding work, with exceptions and oversight available to the team. In a tailored demonstration, examine an encounter from documentation through coding, review and claim preparation. The examples on this page are scripted demonstrations.

Built around your health center

Let's work through the scenarios your team knows are difficult.

Less administrative friction. More capacity for the work that matters to your community.

Request Demo
We use cookies
High Performer