01
Protect your revenue cycle
Reduce coding backlogs, capture supported services, and address coding issues before claims move forward.
XpertCoding for Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)
Your team understands the complexity of community healthcare. Your coding platform should, too. Meet autonomous AI built around the clinical, quality, and payer decisions between the note and the claim.
Built around FQHC encounter, payer, and quality workflows.
For your health center's leadership
Your health center needs timely coding, accurate claims, and less administrative work. XpertCoding uses autonomous AI to code documented care within your existing EHR workflow, with expert review for cases that need attention.
01
Reduce coding backlogs, capture supported services, and address coding issues before claims move forward.
02
Reduce manual coding work, identify documentation gaps, and capture supported diagnoses and quality codes.
03
Monitor turnaround, review exceptions, and follow the evidence behind coding decisions.
Texas · FQHC
Read the press releaseMassachusetts · FQHC
Read the press releaseArizona · FQHC
New Mexico · FQHC
California · FQHC
Arizona · FQHC
Florida · FQHC
The details are the difference
FQHC billing has its own rules. XpertCoding connects the care documented by your team to supported codes, payer requirements, and reviewable decisions.
01 / CPT & HCPCS
Same-day medical and mental health care; AWVs; qualifying visits and bundled services.
02 / The diagnosis
Secondary diagnosis reporting requirements, accurate acuity, SDOH, and linkage to the service performed.
03 / The quality
Blood pressure and A1c results mapped to quality codes, with program eligibility checks.
04 / The claim
77x claim types, qualifying services, revenue codes, and FQHC specific HCPCS codes
CPT & HCPCS coding
Capture the care delivered and apply the appropriate FQHC payment rules.
Start with the CPT code: the E&M level, procedure or therapy supported by the note. Then connect it to the HCPCS payment codes and payer rules that shape an FQHC claim.
Evaluate the documented E&M service and procedures. In this example, 99213 and 90832 represent the separately documented medical and psychotherapy services.
Capture supported services, correct unsupported codes, and retain service detail even when payment is bundled into the encounter rate.
Pair the qualifying CPT services with G0467 and G0470 in the Medicare FQHC example.
ICD-10-CM coding
Represent the complexity of your patients with diagnoses supported by the record.
Community health documentation often spans chronic disease, behavioral health, and barriers to care. Capture that complexity without inventing a diagnosis.
Use the clinician's assessment to select the supported diabetes code. A high lab value alone does not substitute for the diagnosis.
A signed care-team note documents that the patient is housed and at risk of homelessness. The social need is relevant to the current care plan.
The clinician explicitly identifies the old neuropathy entry as an error. Remove that unsupported claim diagnosis and retain the supported findings.
The standard ICD-10-CM code set applies. This example uses the FY 2027 rules for an October 2026 encounter. Read the coding guidelines
Quality-metric coding
Support quality workflows with documented information, and appropriate code capture.
Connect supported quality-code opportunities to payer programs and the health center's reporting team. UDS requirements remain a separately defined reporting workflow.
Check the applicable patient, visit, timing, and exclusion criteria. Finding a value in the note is the beginning of the review, not the whole decision.
Keep claim-level quality coding, payer incentives, and reporting programs distinct. Apply the relevant program version and contract context to the opportunity under review.
HRSA Health Center Program awardees and look-alikes submit UDS data. Preserve the source values and dates that the separately scoped reporting workflow needs.
In this hypertension encounter, the documented reading supports 3074F and 3078F under the illustrated payer reporting workflow. Check both values and prevent duplicate reporting.
Record: a 58-year-old patient with hypertension; blood pressure 128/76 mmHg. The configured payer accepts Category II reporting.
3074F + 3078F reflect the documented systolic and diastolic ranges. The demo checks the current encounter, source reading, and duplication before preparing both codes.
Claim-level reporting supports the quality workflow; measure eligibility, exclusions and annual reporting remain separate checks. 2026 payer coding reference
Explore the coding and quality workflows that matter to your FQHC.
Billing & payer requirements
Prepare claim details around the FQHC rules and payer requirements that apply.
For Medicare, inspect a 77X claim with each FQHC payment code and its qualifying service. For Medicaid, follow the separately labeled Arizona encounter example.
Review the FQHC 77X claim, PPS payment code, qualifying service, and revenue-code relationships in the Medicare example.
Autonomy you can understand
XpertCoding brings autonomous coding together with payer context and reviewable decisions. Your team needs to see the work completed, the cases that need attention and the evidence behind each action.
Understand the encounter and the information available.
Bring the applicable requirements into the decision process.
Make the result understandable to the team responsible for it.
Business intelligence & documentation improvement
See which claims need attention and where documentation can improve.
Connect the coding work to the decisions your revenue-cycle, quality and clinical teams make next.
Results
See how quickly coding moves, how much needs expert review and where your team should focus.
Processing time
23hours
Time from documentation to coding output.
Manual review
8%
Share of encounters routed for expert review.
In your demo, review your current coding backlog, turnaround and review workload. Use those measures to define the operating goals for your FQHC.
Which encounters are waiting, and why?
Which cases need people, and which can move automatically?
Which documentation gaps need a targeted response?
Review your backlog, turnaround and team workload with XpertDox.
Coding compliance
Know how coding decisions are checked and who oversees the work.
Documentation support, validation, expert oversight and traceability belong in the same conversation. Follow the documentation, validation and review steps below.
Start with the documentation that supports the action. Review supported additions alongside corrections, removals and unresolved conflicts.
Coding & compliance leadership
MHA, RHIT, CCS, CRCR, CPM, FAHIMA
Chief Medical Coding and Compliance Officer
Member, AHIMA Board of Directors
More than 20 years in health information, revenue cycle and technology.
Cybersecurity & continuity
Review the safeguards that protect patient information and keep coding operations available.
Controls and independent examination
Information security management
Business continuity management
Patient-information protection
Walk through coding oversight, validation and the decision record.
Implementation
Know what changes for your team, who owns each step and how you approve go-live.
Connect your EHR, validate the FQHC coding decisions and launch with clear ownership. Your team keeps its documentation workflow while XpertDox manages the coding connection, configuration and ongoing review.
EHR and practice-management connections include
Using another EHR or PM system? We can scope a custom connection with your team.
Choose a connection method, then follow a completed encounter into XpertCoding and back to the working system.
Use ADT messages for patient and encounter context. Configure the accompanying documentation and charge interfaces for the full exchange, including return of coding output to the EHR or PM system.
The source encounter brings the signed note, patient and encounter identifiers, documented services and existing coding into the agreed workflow.
Receive completed documentation…
Select a phase to see the work, the owners and the decision that moves the project forward.
Map FQHC sites, EHR access, payer enrollment and the relationship between encounter-payment and service lines.
A shared plan, regular status reviews and clear escalation contacts keep technical and coding work moving together.
Your designated reviewer and clinical decision-maker resolve questions, approve preferences and provide feedback during validation.
Confirm milestones after access, interface requirements, documentation and reviewer availability are understood. Connection setup is one part of the full rollout.
Discuss your EHR, service lines and rollout plan.
Hear from FQHC peers
Hear how Federally Qualified Community Health Centers describe their experience with XpertCoding.
FQHC partnership
We've cleared our claims backlog, improved our collections, and made our coding much more efficient.
Lone Star Circle of Care
Dr. Tracy Angelocci , Senior Strategic Advisor for Clinical Innovation & Integration, as quoted November 6, 2024.
Read the press releaseFQHC partnership
Our coding team is now able to focus on value-based care initiatives and auditing.
CHP Berkshires
Jesse Suphan , Senior Director of Revenue Cycle & Quality, as quoted November 18, 2025.
Read the press releaseFor the detailed evaluator
XpertCoding is designed to automate coding work, with exceptions and oversight available to the team. In a tailored demonstration, examine an encounter from documentation through coding, review and claim preparation. The examples on this page are scripted demonstrations.
Built around your health center
Less administrative friction. More capacity for the work that matters to your community.